Bubble‐Size distributions and flow fields in bubble columns

By F. Lehr, M. Millies, Dieter Mewes. 2002

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modelling of mass transfer in gas–liquid stirred tanks agitated by Rushton turbine and CD-6 impeller: A scale-up study (2009, methodology): “Laakkonen et al. (2007a) has compared the prediction of two different kernels i.e. Lehr et al. (2002) and a modified version of Prince and Blanch models.”
Two-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review (2018, background): “[497] based on experimental data, showing that a small approach velocity leads to higher coalescence rates.”
Drop coalescence in technical liquid/liquid applications: a review on experimental techniques and modeling approaches (2017, background): “In the works of Chesters (1991) and Liao and Lucas (2010), drainage models for different interfacial conditions [rigid/ (partially) mobile] are summarized, which were derived analytically to obtain the film drainage times. Drainage rates considering the mentioned droplet interactions by Danov et al.”