One or Many? The Influence of Episodic and Thematic Climate Change Frames on Policy Preferences and Individual Behavior Change

By P. Sol Hart. 2011

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfd0cc278bda5fc9343f51c7f51c44f9457d4f35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Thomas DiBlasi
2. Z. Janet Yang
3. Soojung Kim
4. P. Walton
5. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
6. L. Rickard
7. Mihye Seo
8. Teresa M. Harrison

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Rickard
2. Mihye Seo
3. Teresa M. Harrison
4. Thomas DiBlasi
5. Z. Janet Yang
6. Soojung Kim
7. P. Walton
8. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh

Citations in the corpus

• Applying the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model to Examine Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policy (2014, background): “To date, research on climate change communication has largely focused on trends in news coverage (Boykoff & Boykoff, 2007; McComas & Shanahan, 1999) or the impact of message framing on individuals’ policy preferences (Hart, 2011; Hart & Nisbet, 2012).”
• What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “Results of a study by Hart (2011) suggest framing climate change impacts in thematic instead of episodic terms.”
• Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behaviors of American and Korean Students (2013, background): “Previous studies have examined various message factors (e.g., Hart, 2011) as well as psychological factors (e.g., Bamberg, 2003; de Groot & Steg, 2010) that are likely to induce changes in individuals’ behaviors.”
• The Impact of Climate Change–Related Imagery and Text on Public Opinion and Behavior Change (2016, unknown): “Nisbet, 2009; Spence & Pidgeon, 2010), the identified victim effect (Hart, 2011; Markowitz, Slovic, Västfjäll, & Hodges, 2013), and polarization (Dunlap & McCright, 2008; Dunlap, Xiao, & McCright, 2001; Hart, Nisbet, & Myers, 2015), among others.”
• Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos (2021, methodology): “…(to push for climate action through voting, petitions, protests, etc.) were calculated by averaging responses to a series of actions, adapted from Hart (2010), Hart and Feldman (2016), and Skurka et al. (2018), in which participants noted their likelihood of conducting such activities on a…”
• Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation (2013, unknown): “For example, Hart (2011) found that information about the negative effects of climate change on all polar bears produced stronger support for ameliorative environmental policies than did information about negative effects on a single bear; however, this study did not examine individuals’”