Higgs boson production at the LHC
By K. Peters. 2015
519 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfc3f9dadfaeb5dfffda3271bfe79d23f0557379
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cms Collaboration
- Atlas Collaboration
- Gudrun Heinrich
- Ansgar Denner
- M. Grazzini
- R. Frederix
- J. Bendavid
- A. Larkoski
Citations in the corpus
- NLO electroweak automation and precise predictions for W + multijet production at the LHC (2014, methodology): “The first one is based on Munich, a fully generic and very fast parton-level Monte Carlo integrator that has already been applied to various nontrivial multi-particle NLO calculations [48, 50, 58–60] and also to NNLO calculations [55–57] based on qT-subtraction [61].”
- High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC (2016, background): “The exact mass dependence of the cross-section is also known at NLO [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 40], and we can thus include all effects from top, bottom and charm quarks up to that order.”
- NNLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at large transverse momentum (2016, methodology): “and validated this implementation for fiducial cross sections against the publicly available HNNLO code [14].”
- Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report (2016, methodology): “– qT [83]: Phase-space slicing approach for colour-less final states applied to many pp → V V ′ processes.”
- Measurement of the Z/ѵ* boson transverse momentum distribution in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2014, methodology): “Fully differential inclusive boson-production cross sections can be obtained to second order in the strong coupling constant α S (NNLO) using the Fewz 3.1 [4–6] and Dynnlo 1.3 [18, 19] programs.”
- Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\o (2015, unknown): “For the ggF process, the cross section is computed at up to NNLO in QCD corrections [33–38] and NLO in electroweak (EW) corrections [39–41].”
- Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD (2012, methodology): “For the gluon-fusion process, both inclusive and differential, it turns out that this factor is rather insensitive to the top-quark mass effects [22–29].”
- Measurement of W ± and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2016, background): “5 [4,5] for the central value and Fewz 3.”
- Predictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD (2016, methodology): “The QT -slicing method is based on the same factorization and ingredients that were used in the previous QT -subtraction calculation [23].”
- OpenLoops 2 (2019, background): “where the last term originates from the two-loop matching of the Higgs effective coupling [71,72].”
- Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the ATLAS detector (2017, methodology): “The MC predictions are initially normalized to next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) perturbative QCD (pQCD) predictions according to DYNNLO [61, 62] using the MSTW2008 90% CL NNLO PDF set [63].”
- Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties (2013, methodology): “[37] that the two-loop bottom-gluon contribution to th e amplitude for Higgs decay in two photons is minimized when the bottom mass is defined as mb(Mφ/2), even if the one-loop bottom contribution has exactly the same structure as the corresponding contrib ution to gluon fusion.”
- Les Houches 2017: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report (2017, background): “– qT [152]: Phase-space slicing approach for colourless final states, applied to many pp → V V ′ processes.”