Forestry in bioeconomy – smart green growth for the humankind

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy (2017, background): “Focusing mostly on Europe, for instance, Priefer et al. (2017), Pfau et al. (2014), Ollikainen (2014) and McCormick and Kautto (2013) identify the existing gaps and needs for incorporating new insights into existing understanding.”
Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era of bio-based economy (2018, background): “Forests provide 53 jobs, income and biomass for substituting fossil-based materials and energy, and compared with 54 other sources of biomass forests have the advantage of a large production potential, which does 55 not threaten food security (Ollikainen 2014; EC 2012b).”
Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues (2017, background): “In this context forestry and the agriculture and forest industry can play a fundamental role in providing bio-based substitutes for nonrenewables (Ollikainen, 2014; Roos and Stendahl, 2015).”
The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy (2018, background): “However, Ollikainen (2014) has pointed out that existing discourses do not fully recognize the role of the forest-based bioeconomy, and that the EU bioeconomy strategy does not duly address forest sector renewal, for example.”