Review of Active Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Resonance
By Louis N. Cattafesta, David R. Williams, Clarence W. Rowley, Farrukh S. Alvi. 2003
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfa3e49d915a76818905aa04f4e499b09b77a3de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Steven L. Brunton
- Bernd R. Noack
- Thomas Duriez
- J. Nathan Kutz
- Joshua L. Proctor
- Clarence W. Rowley
- Eurika Kaiser
- M. Pastoor
Citations in the corpus
- Feedback control of subsonic cavity flows using reduced-order models (2007, background): “A comprehensive review of this phenomenon and of various control and actuation strategies developed for its suppression is given in Cattafesta et al. (2003) and Rowley & Williams (2006).”
- Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction (2008, background): “Current application of closed-loop flow control mainly concentrates on few well established benchmark problems, such as the control of the flow around a circular cylinder, around a backward-facing step or over a cavity (Cattafesta et al. 2003; Collis et al. 2004).”
- Machine Learning Control – Taming Nonlinear Dynamics and Turbulence (2016, background): “For example, in fluid dynamics there are numerous success stories of linear model-based flow control, including transition delay in a spatially developing boundary layer on a flat plate and in channel flow [29, 136, 135, 63, 142, 13, 11, 12, 244, 245, 101], reducing skinfriction drag in wall turbule”