Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next-generation sequencing for plant systematics.

By S. Straub, Matthew Parks, Kevin A. Weitemier, M. Fishbein, R. Cronn, A. Liston. American-Eurasian journal of botany, 2012

616 citations recorded by the source corpus.

PREMISE OF THE STUDY Just as Sanger sequencing did more than 20 years ago, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is poised to revolutionize plant systematics. By combining multiplexing approaches with NGS throughput, systematists may no longer need to choose between more taxa or more characters. Here we describe a genome skimming (shallow sequencing) approach for plant systematics. METHODS Through simulations, we evaluated optimal sequencing depth and performance of single-end and paired-end short read sequences for assembly of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and plastomes and addressed the effect of divergence on reference-guided plastome assembly. We also used simulations to identify potential phylogenetic markers from low-copy nuclear loci at different sequencing depths. We demonstrated the utility of genome skimming through phylogenetic analysis of the Sonoran Desert clade (SDC) of Asclepias (Apocynaceae). KEY RESULTS Paired-end reads performed better than single-end reads. Minimum sequencing depths for high quality rDNA and plastome assemblies were 40× and 30×, respectively. Divergence from the reference significantly affected plastome assembly, but relatively similar references are available for most seed plants. Deeper rDNA sequencing is necessary to characterize intragenomic polymorphism. The low-copy fraction of the nuclear genome was readily surveyed, even at low sequencing depths. Nearly 160000 bp of sequence from three organelles provided evidence of phylogenetic incongruence in the SDC. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of NGS will facilitate progress in plant systematics, as whole plastome and rDNA cistrons, partial mitochondrial genomes, and low-copy nuclear markers can now be efficiently obtained for molecular phylogenetics studies.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df97ad5a0450e5b19a4086b80271f45c290e636d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Jun Wen
  2. Alexandre Antonelli
  3. R. Pennington
  4. Xiuqun Liu
  5. Zhi‐Yao Ma
  6. Alex Crampton-Platt
  7. C. Gómez‐Rodríguez
  8. K. Jensen

In Molecular Biology

  1. Jun Wen
  2. Xiuqun Liu
  3. Zhi‐Yao Ma
  4. Alex Crampton-Platt
  5. C. Gómez‐Rodríguez
  6. Alexandre Antonelli
  7. K. Jensen
  8. R. Pennington

In Plant Science

  1. Alex Crampton-Platt
  2. C. Gómez‐Rodríguez
  3. Alexandre Antonelli
  4. K. Jensen
  5. R. Pennington
  6. M. Timmermans
  7. Jun Wen
  8. E. Zimmer

Citations in the corpus