Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology

By William Sims Bainbridge. 2002

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df9730e8fa07054a88ea6e2287cf59bd341cd720

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Dietram A. Scheufele
2. Bruce V. Lewenstein
3. Mihail C. Roco
4. H. M. Azeredo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Dietram A. Scheufele
2. Mihail C. Roco
3. Bruce V. Lewenstein
4. Shirley S. Ho
5. Andrew F. Hayes
6. Kristopher J Preacher
7. Douglas M. McLeod

Citations in the corpus

• The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies (2005, background): “In fact, many of these earlier studies focused mostly on descriptive analyses of media coverage (Gaskell et al., 2004) or of perceptions of risks and benefits of nanotechnology ( Bainbridge, 2002; Cobb & Macoubrie, 2004) and did not examine the relatively complex influences of many of these variabl”
• Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology (2003, background): “…theme in the NSF annual program solicitations; (b) contributions in the research and education centers; and (c) a new initiative on the impact of technology and converging technologies form the nanoscale for improving human performance (nano-bio-info-cognition convergence; Roco & Bainbridge, 2002).”