Seven new species of Oculatella (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria): taxonomically recognizing cryptic diversification

By Karina Osorio-Santos, N. Pietrasiak, M. Bohunická, Laura H. Miscoe, L. Kováčik, Michael P. Martin, J. Johansen. 2014

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df90b6a6bfcc79ebbbf9c2e89e06b7bddff1db42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. D. Casamatta
2. M. Bohunická
3. N. Pietrasiak
4. J. Johansen
5. Michael P. Martin
6. Trúc Mai
7. M. Belli
8. A. Poulíčková

In Environmental Chemistry

1. N. Pietrasiak
2. M. Bohunická
3. Michael P. Martin
4. D. Casamatta
5. J. Johansen
6. Jan Kaštovský
7. J. Komárek

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Johansen
2. Trúc Mai
3. M. Belli
4. A. Poulíčková
5. Anabella Aguilera
6. Alessio Papini
7. Michael P. Martin
8. T. Hauer

Citations in the corpus

• The polyphasic analysis of two native Raphidiopsis isolates supports the unification of the genera Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) (2018, background): “Recently, the joining of 16S rRNA gene phylogenies with analysis of 16S–23S ITS secondary structure proved to be useful in circumscribing cyanobacterial genera and in recognising intrageneric taxonomic diversity (Johansen et al. 2011; Osorio-Santos et al. 2014; Sciuto & Moro 2016).”
• Roholtiella , gen. nov. (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria)—a tapering and branching cyanobacteria of the family Nostocaceae (2015, methodology): “6B) and with past studies in which cryptic species were identified using this method (erwin & thacker 2008, osorio-Santos et al. 2014, Pietrasiak et al. 2014).”
• Revision of the Synechococcales (Cyanobacteria) through recognition of four families including Oculatellaceae fam. nov. and Trichocoleaceae fam. nov. and six new genera containing 14 species (2018, methodology): “…species is further supported by the large percent dissimilarity of the 16S–23S ITS region (≥8.2%, see Table 8), which several papers have found useful as evidence of cryptic species separation in other cyanobacterial genera (erwin & Thacker 2008, osorio-Santos et al. 2014, Pietrasiak et al. 2014).”
• Species concepts and speciation factors in cyanobacteria, with connection to the problems of diversity and classification (2015, background): “Cryptic species have been identified or suggested in almost all traditional genera (Koma´rek 2010) such as with the mat-forming cyanobacteria Microcoleus (Siegesmund et al. 2008), Oculatella (Osorio-Santos et al. 2014), Tri-chocoleus (Mu¨hlsteinova´ et al. 2014) and Phormidium (Casamatta et al. 2003;”