Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

By P. Rothwell, M. Eliasziw, S. Gutnikov, A. Fox, D. Taylor, M. Mayberg, C. Warlow, H. Barnett. The Lancet, 2003

1,559 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df8f01827fbd1b0919794b1649c3a4e345e9fd21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Ringleb
2. John P. A. Ioannidis
3. Álvaro Cervara
4. G. Ford
5. M. Walker
6. M. Bousser
7. M. Brainin
8. Á. Chamorro

Citations in the corpus

• Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. (2005, result): “The findings of 20 highly cited articles (44%) were replicated (also with a larger sample size in subsequent research compared with the original highly cited study) and 11 (24%) had remained largely unchallenged.(58-78)”
• Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. (2008, methodology): “Although ECST (European Carotid Surgery Trialists) and NASCET use different methods of measurement, it is possible to convert the percentage stenosis derived by one method to the other [335].”