Multi-model ensemble simulations of tropospheric NO2 compared with GOME retrievals for the year 2000

By T. P. C. V. Noije, H. Eskes, F. Dentener, D. Stevenson, K. Ellingsen, M. G. Schultz, O. Wild, Markus Amann, C. Atherton, D. Bergmann and 26 more. 2006

2,242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a systematic comparison of tropo- spheric NO2 from 17 global atmospheric chemistry mod- els with three state-of-the-art retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) for the year 2000. The models used constant anthropogenic emissions from IIASA/EDGAR3.2 and monthly emissions from biomass burning based on the 1997-2002 average carbon emissions from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED). Model output is analyzed at 10:30 local time, close to the overpass time of the ERS-2 satellite, and collocated with the measure- ments to account for sampling biases due to incomplete spa-

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df8216da158f93e27063e509e1bd1fb38af8bf1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Brent N. Holben
  2. Ulrich Pöschl
  3. C. Randles
  4. Alexander Smirnov
  5. Peter R. Colarco
  6. Pieternel F. Levelt
  7. Anton Darmenov
  8. V. Buchard

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Brent N. Holben
  2. Ulrich Pöschl
  3. C. Randles
  4. Alexander Smirnov
  5. Peter R. Colarco
  6. Pieternel F. Levelt
  7. David P. Roy
  8. Luigi Boschetti

Citations in the corpus