Multi-model ensemble simulations of tropospheric NO2 compared with GOME retrievals for the year 2000
By T. P. C. V. Noije, H. Eskes, F. Dentener, D. Stevenson, K. Ellingsen, M. G. Schultz, O. Wild, Markus Amann, C. Atherton, D. Bergmann and 26 more. 2006
2,242 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present a systematic comparison of tropo- spheric NO2 from 17 global atmospheric chemistry mod- els with three state-of-the-art retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) for the year 2000. The models used constant anthropogenic emissions from IIASA/EDGAR3.2 and monthly emissions from biomass burning based on the 1997-2002 average carbon emissions from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED). Model output is analyzed at 10:30 local time, close to the overpass time of the ERS-2 satellite, and collocated with the measure- ments to account for sampling biases due to incomplete spa-
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df8216da158f93e27063e509e1bd1fb38af8bf1f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Brent N. Holben
- Ulrich Pöschl
- C. Randles
- Alexander Smirnov
- Peter R. Colarco
- Pieternel F. Levelt
- Anton Darmenov
- V. Buchard
In Global and Planetary Change
- Brent N. Holben
- Ulrich Pöschl
- C. Randles
- Alexander Smirnov
- Peter R. Colarco
- Pieternel F. Levelt
- David P. Roy
- Luigi Boschetti
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of Adjoint and Analytical Bayesian Inversion Methods for Constraining Asian Sources of Carbon Monoxide Using Satellite (MOPITT) Measurements of CO Columns (2009, background): “The adjoint solution agrees closely with van der Werf et al. [2006] for southeastern Asia (Table 1) and eastern India (Figure 4) as biomass burning emissions constitute >80% of total emissions in those regions.”
- The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part II: Evaluation and Case Studies. (2017, methodology): “These emissions apply a QFED scaling to RETROv2 emissions (1980–96; Duncan et al. 2003) and the Global Fire Emission Dataset (GFED), version 3.1 (1997–2009; Randerson et al. 2006; van der Werf et al. 2006).”
- The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source (2007, methodology): “Models compute that LNO x contributes less than 20% to the column (Martin et EGU al., 2003; Boersma et al., 2005; van Noije et al., 2006) with localized fractions of more than 80% in regions with weak surface NO x emissions (Martin et al., 2007).”
- Heterogeneous freezing of ice on atmospheric aerosols containing ash, soot, and soil (2009, neutral): “Particles containing humic-like substances (HULIS) are present in the atmosphere in high concentrations and are also potentially important nuclei [ Graber and Rudich , 2006].”
- The deposition ice nucleation and immersion freezing potential of amorphous secondary organic aerosol: Pathways for ice and mixed‐phase cloud formation (2012, neutral): “…as SRFA, is often applied as surrogates of soluble atmospheric HUmic-LIke Substances (HULIS) which represent multifunctional organic material with high molecular weight typical of biomass burning aerosol [e.g., Fuzzi et al., 2001; Dinar et al., 2006a; Graber and Rudich, 2006;Wang and Knopf, 2011].”
- The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation. (2017, methodology): “Between 1997 and 2009 we employ a scaled version of the MODIS burned-area based Global Fire Emission Dataset (GFED) version 3.1 monthly biomass burning emissions (Randerson et al. 2006; van der Werf et al. 2006).”
- A global simulation of brown carbon: Implications for photochemistry and direct radiative effect (2015, neutral): “, 2006), although the sources and the dominating chromophores of HULIS have not clearly been revealed yet (Moise et al., 2015; Graber and Rudich, 2006).”
- The Collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product (2018, background): “In addition, since 2006 the MCD64A1 product has been a major component of the Global Fire Emissions Database (Giglio et al., 2010, 2013; van der Werf et al., 2006, 2010, 2017), which has in turn been used in the investigation of a similarly broad set of research questions (e.g., Chen et al., 2013;…”
- Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets (2008, background): “Wildfires release massive amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere (van der Werf et al. 2006; Wiedinmyer and Neff 2007).”
- Atmosphere: A Source of Pathogenic or Beneficial Microbes? (2012, background): “Recently, the biodegradation of the most abundant atmospheric organic C1 to C4 compounds (formate, acetate, lactate, succinate) by five selected representative microbial strains (three Pseudomonas strains, one Sphingomonas strain, and one yeast strain) isolated from cloud water at the Puy de Dôme wa”