Evaluation of seed quality: from physiology to international standardization

By Stan Matthwes, Ibrahim Demir, M. Hosseini, E. Noli, Wagner. Seed Science Research, 2011

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Problems with using mean germination time to calculate rate of seed germination (2015, background): “2010; Hacisalihoglu and Ross2010;Oliveira andGarcia 2011;CheibandGarcia 2012) and to evaluate seed vigour (Matthews and Khajeh-Hosseini 2006, 2007; Khajeh-Hosseini et al. 2009; Mavi et al. 2010; Matthews et al. 2012) and seed-dormancy loss (Chen et al.”
Seed vigor testing: an overview of the past, present and future perspective (2015, unknown): “In addition, Matthews et al. (2012) reported that DNA ligases that repair double-stranded breaks in chromosomes and delay root protrusion have been identified; these should constitute other markers to identify declines in viability and a greater incidence of abnormal seedlings.”
Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. (2016, unknown): “Nevertheless, the importance of MGT or an indicative timed single count as an indicator of rate and final seedling emergence has been demonstrated in a wide range of crop species (Matthews et al., 2012) Germination time is determined by both genetics and the production environment (Fig.”