At the Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD
By G. Sterman. 2002
804 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df6142ca092145812564551b498c22f34d9cd754
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Search for the QCD critical point with fluctuations of conserved quantities in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC: an overview (2017, methodology): “At large μB region, the QCD based models predicted that the phase transition is of the first order [5, 6] and there should exist a so called QCD Critical Point (CP) as the endpoint of the first order phase boundary [7, 8].”
- Parameter-free effective field theory calculation for the solar proton-fusion and hep processes (2002, neutral): “[46]), which has been applied to the pp fusion [47].”
- Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars (2002, methodology): “As an alternative, methods based on effective field theory (Beane et al., 2001; van Kolck, 1999) have recently been developed for very light nuclei (A ≤ 3) (Marcucci et al., 2000, 2001; Park et al., 2001a,b).”
- New Charmonium States in QCD Sum Rules: a Concise Review (2009, background): “Correlation functions QCD sum rules are discussed in many reviews [69, 70, 71, 72] emphasizing various aspects of the method.”
- Establishing the first hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness (2020, methodology): “——– We still use the current η2 as an example to perform numerical analyses, where we use the following values for various QCD sum rule parameters [4, 42,44,45,46,47,48,49,43,50]: ms = 96 +8 −4 MeV , mc = 1.”
- The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD (2003, methodology): “This expression corresponds to taking into account contributions of all conformal operators with arbitrary spin, assuming “ultraviolet dominance” [72, 76] of the corresponding matrix elements and neglecting the (logarithmic) effects of the anomalous dimensions altogether.”