Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra‐Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton

By P. Jost, J. T. Cothren. 2001

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df59b1c94d46ba17f83f3d43ea2f92b401d1b2d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. David C. Blouin
2. E. L. Clawson
3. J. T. Cothren

Citations in the corpus

• Cotton growth, lint yield, and fiber quality as affected by row spacing and cultivar (2004, background): “When cotton was hand-harvested, thus removing the effect of machine efficiency and reducing the possibility of introducing bark and leaf trash in the samples, lint percentage was greater in narrow rows than conventional row spacings (Jost and Cothren, 2001).”
• Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra‐Narrow and Conventional Row Spacings (2006, background): “Subset individual boll weight was decreased by reduction in row spacing (Table 6). Relative to CR, earlier canopy closure (Jost and Cothren, 2000) and faster development of leaf area index ( Jost and Cothren, 2001 ) have been documented for UNR cotton.”