A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, research unit sustainability and global change

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies (2010, methodology): “, 1999; Bateman and Jones, 2003), and other European forests (Zandersen and Tol, 2009).”
Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services (2013, result): “This is 5 times higher than the previous Danish study based on a zonal travel cost model, but lower than most other European studies (Zandersen and Toll, 2009).”
Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. (2013, methodology): “For example, in a meta-analysis on forest values, Zandersen and Tol (2009) used not only strictly valuedetermining explanatory variables (such as GDP per capita and other socioeconomic characteristics) but also biophysical variables which correlate with ESS supply, such as fraction of open land,…”
Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units (2012, background): “…2006; Enjolras and Boisson, 2008; Ghermandi et al., 2010; Brander et al., 2011), coral reefs (Brander et al., 2007; Stoeckl et al., 2011), forests (Zandersen and Tol, 2009), woodland recreation (Bateman and Jones, 2003), biodiversity (Nijkamp and Vindigni, 2003), outdoor recreation (Rosenberger…”