From welfare to work: does the neighborhood matter?

By B. Klaauw, J. van Ours. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df32b18ea09b55df1814035cc13e60349f930b30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. Galster
2. S. Wheatley Price
3. S. Gaechter
4. M. Wooden
5. Michael A. Shields
6. Roger Andersson
7. S. Musterd
8. Timo Kauppinen

In Finance

1. G. Galster
2. S. Gaechter
3. Roger Andersson
4. S. Musterd
5. Timo Kauppinen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Galster
2. S. Wheatley Price
3. S. Gaechter
4. M. Wooden
5. Michael A. Shields
6. Christopher M. Fleming
7. C. Ambrey
8. S. Musterd

Citations in the corpus

• Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications (2006, background): “(Bertrand et al. 2000; van der Klaauw and van Ours 2003 ), which is also predicted by”
• Should Policy Makers Strive for Neighborhood Social Mix? An Analysis of the Western European Evidence Base (2007, background): “Van der Klaauw & Van Ours ( 2003 ) analyzed Rotterdam administrative data and found a strong inverse relationship between the transition rate from welfare to work for young Dutch welfare recipients and their neighborhood unemployment rate.”
• Life satisfaction and the economic and social characteristics of neighbourhoods (2009, background): “Ginther et al. 2000; Jensen and Seltzer 2000; Oreopoulos 2003; van der Klaauw and van Ours 2003 ) rather than examining the direct effect of locality on measures of individual well-being.”