A Trainable System for Object Detection
By Constantine Papageorgiou, Tomaso A. Poggio. 2000
1,485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Xiaogang Wang
- Bernt Schiele
- Andrew Zisserman
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals? (2015, methodology): “As recently as a few years ago, the most successful approaches to object detection utilised the well known “sliding window” paradigm [1]–[3], in which a computationally ef-ficient classifier tests for object presence in every candidate image window.”
- Sharing Visual Features for Multiclass and Multiview Object Detection (2007, background): “Such a classifier can be turned into a detector by sliding it across the image (or image pyramid) and classifying each such local window [26], [16], [1].”
- Context-based vision system for place and object recognition (2003, background): “Another difference between our approach to object recognition and previous approaches is that we try to recognize a large set of object types (24) in a natural, unconstrained setting (images are collected by a wearable camera), as opposed to recognizing a small number of classes (such as faces and c”
- Efficient Classification for Additive Kernel SVMs (2013, methodology): “This class of kernels, which we refer to as additive kernels, includes widely used kernels for histogram-based image comparison like intersection and chi-squared kernels.”
- Open Vocabulary Object Detection with Pseudo Bounding-Box Labels (2021, background): “Object detection [11, 19, 20, 27] is a core task in computer vision that has considerably advanced with the adoption of deep learning and continues to attract significant research effort [26, 31, 33].”
- Learning to detect objects in images via a sparse, part-based representation (2004, background): “…approaches to object detection have included raw pixel intensities [7], [8], [9], features obtained via global image transformations [10], [11], and local features such as edge fragments [12], [13], rectangle features [14], Gabor filter-based representations [15], and wavelet features [16].”
- Pedestrian detection in crowded scenes (2005, methodology): “Previous approaches to pedestrian detection have used either global models, e.g. using full-body appearance [20] or silhouettes [11] [10] [8]; or an assembly of local feature [23] or part detectors [18] [17].”
- Human Detection Using Oriented Histograms of Flow and Appearance (2006, methodology): “A polynomial SVM based pedestrian detector (upright whole-body human detector) using rectified Haar wavelets as input descriptors is described in [17] , with a parts (subwindow) based variant in [16].”
- Watching Unlabeled Video Helps Learn New Human Actions from Very Few Labeled Snapshots (2013, background): “, [20]), as well as the use of graphics software to generate images of people (often driven by mocap) with variable clothing and body sizes to train pose estimators [26, 12, 27].”
- Finding People in Images and Videos (2006, methodology): “The static (appearance based) detectors shown are: R-HOG – our default R-HOG trained on combined data set; R-HOG (static) – R-HOG trained on the Static Test Set alone, essentially same as in Chapter 4; and Wavelet – our version of the static Haar wavelet based detector of Papageorgiou and Poggio [20”
- Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk (2008, background): “It is obvious from this figure that hips are much more difficult to localize compared to shoulders, knees, elbows, wrists, ankles, the head and the neck.”
- Contextual Priming for Object Detection (2003, background): “P ( j on; ~vC) = PM i=1 biG( ; i;Si)G(~vC ;~vi;Vi) PM i=1 biG(~vC ;~vi;Vi) (28)”
- An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification (2006, methodology): “Papageorgiou and Poggio [5] pioneered the use of overcomplete sets of (Haar) wavelet features in combination with a Support Vector Machine (SVM).”
- Support vector tracking (2004, neutral): “Finally, several researchers [22], [9], [13], [14], [15], [20] perform object detection on every frame, ignoring object tracking all together.”
- Human Detection via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds (2007, methodology): “In [16], a polynomial support vector machine (SVM) was learned using Haar wavelets as human descriptors.”
- Cat Head Detection - How to Effectively Exploit Shape and Texture Features (2008, methodology): “The image features are directly extracted from the image, such as intensity values [14], image patch [6], PCA coefficients [11], and wavelet coefficients [12,16,18].”
- Co-occurrence Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Pedestrian Detection (2009, methodology): “used SVM-based parts detectors with Haar wavelet feature and integrated them with SVM [5], [6].”
- Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments (2009, background): “The computational costs are often too high to allow for real-time processing [11], [12], [48], [53], [60], [68].”