REVIEW ARTICLE: RESILIENCE, POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT
By Christophe Béné, Andrew Newsham, M. Davies, M. Ulrichs, Rachel Godfrey-Wood. 2014
406 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df24af1f8b08e3c7fb46dbaaebd0ab7c9feb1887
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Sociology and Political Science
- Christophe Béné
- Christopher B. Barrett
- John Hoddinott
- J. Upton
- Kate Ghezzi-Kopel
- Tong Wu
- N. Homami
- E. Tennant
In Soil Science
- Christophe Béné
- Christopher B. Barrett
- John Hoddinott
- J. Upton
- Kate Ghezzi-Kopel
- Tong Wu
- N. Homami
- E. Tennant
Citations in the corpus
- A scoping review of the development resilience literature: Theory, methods and evidence (2021, background): “The objective of normative anchoring is to ensure that resilience is a pro-poor concept (Barrett and Constas 2014; Béné et al. 2014).”
- Resilience of local food systems and links to food security – A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks (2020, background): “…literature in relation to the concept of resilience and its measurement in the specific context of food security and humanitarian interventions (see e.g. Frankenberger and Nelson 2013; Winderl 2014; Béné et al. 2014; Serfilippi and Raminath 2018; Ansah et al. 2019 for some earlier reviews).”
- Is resilience socially constructed? Empirical evidence from Fiji, Ghana, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam (2016, positive): “Resilience has been increasingly recognized as a potentially useful concept to help practitioners, academics and policy-makers better understand the links between shocks, response and longer-term development outcomes (Constas et al., 2014a; Béné et al., 2014).”