Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency
By Jochen Schubert, B. Sanders. 2012
298 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df1f2979dc2eced5c2613062b14079b78f45988c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Biswajeet Pradhan
- Jiaheng Zhao
- Dongfang Liang
- Reinhard Hinkelmann
- I. Özgen
- Michael Sinclair
- Andrea Ghermandi
In Global and Planetary Change
- Omid Rahmati
- Hamid Darabi
- A. Torabi Haghighi
- Biswajeet Pradhan
- Jiaheng Zhao
- Dongfang Liang
- Reinhard Hinkelmann
- I. Özgen
Citations in the corpus
- Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques (2019, background): “Low quality buildings are unsafe for residents and are more vulnerable to natural hazards, especially earthquakes and floods (Schubert and Sanders, 2012, Gerl et al., 2014).”
- Urban flood modeling using shallow water equations with depth-dependent anisotropic porosity (2016, methodology): “Sanders’ model was further investigated in Kim et al., 2015, Kim et al., 2014, Schubert and Sanders, 2012.”
- Assessing the utility of social media as a data source for flood risk management using a real‐time modelling framework (2017, background): “Allowing water to pass through the narrow gaps then requires high grid resolutions, typically 2m or better (Schubert and Sanders, 2012), demanding millions of grid cells.”