Grassland Bird Conservation: CP1 vs. CP2 Plantings in Conservation Reserve Program Fields in Missouri

By T. Mccoy, M. Ryan, Loren W. BURGER, Jr., E. W. Kurzejeski. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conservation of Grassland Birds in North America: Understanding Ecological Processes in Different Regions: "Report of the AOU Committee on Conservation" (2007, background): “…richness, overall abundance, and nest success appear to be similar in warm-season and cool-season CRP grasslands (e.g., Delisle and Savidge 1997, McCoy et al. 2001) and, in Iowa, species richness and densities of most common bird species were found to be similar in restored CRP grasslands and…”
VARIABILITY IN VEGETATION EFFECTS ON DENSITY AND NESTING SUCCESS OF GRASSLAND BIRDS (2005, unknown): “2 E-mail: mw267@cornell.edu habitat features (e.g., McCoy et al. 2001).”
Critical Demographic Parameters for Declining Songbirds Breeding in Restored Grasslands (2006, background): “There was also no evidence for the planting type influencing nest predation rates (AICc for intercept-only models were lower than planting-type models; DAICc .8.5; cf. McCoy et al. 2001).”
The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels (2005, background): “Conversely, large-scale conversion to switchgrass-for-energy might have adverse impacts on some avian species whose favored habitats are converted to energy cropping ( McCoy et al. , 2001 ; Murray et al.”