The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

By Z. Arzoumanian, P. Baker, Harsha Blumer, B. Bécsy, A. Brazier, P. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, S. Chatterjee, Siyuan Chen, Jim Cordes and 51 more. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2020

718 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) in the 12.5 yr pulsar-timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves. Our analysis finds strong evidence of a stochastic process, modeled as a power law, with common amplitude and spectral slope across pulsars. Under our fiducial model, the Bayesian posterior of the amplitude for an f −2/3 power-law spectrum, expressed as the characteristic GW strain, has median 1.92 × 10−15 and 5%–95% quantiles of 1.37–2.67 × 10−15 at a reference frequency of fyr=1yr−1; the Bayes factor in favor of the common-spectrum process versus independent red-noise processes in each pulsar exceeds 10,000. However, we find no statistically significant evidence that this process has quadrupolar spatial correlations, which we would consider necessary to claim a GWB detection consistent with general relativity. We find that the process has neither monopolar nor dipolar correlations, which may arise from, for example, reference clock or solar system ephemeris systematics, respectively. The amplitude posterior has significant support above previously reported upper limits; we explain this in terms of the Bayesian priors assumed for intrinsic pulsar red noise. We examine potential implications for the supermassive black hole binary population under the hypothesis that the signal is indeed astrophysical in nature.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df091430d0b50a4be8371c1b0f8f3b5fb363dda2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. G. Hobbs
  2. R. Shannon
  3. R. Manchester
  4. S. Burke-Spolaor
  5. D. R. Lorimer
  6. S. Taylor
  7. M. Bailes
  8. X. Siemens

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. R. Shannon
  2. G. Hobbs
  3. E. Komatsu
  4. Chung-Pei Ma
  5. S. Burke-Spolaor
  6. R. D’Agnolo
  7. J. Schütte-Engel
  8. K. Chatziioannou

Citations in the corpus