Revealed Preferences in a Heterogeneous Population

By Stefan Hoderlein, Jörg Stoye. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014

77 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nonparametric Welfare Analysis for Discrete Choice (2014, background): “" When the heterogeneity distribution F B ( ) is unknown, the theorems and corollaries of DK05 do not provide identication results; they express analytically the objects of interest written on the LHS in equation (12), theorem 2, corollary 2 etc.”
Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models (2016, methodology): “6) B= 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 and then use a standard moment inequalities method, such as GMS, on this. This is the essence of inference in Hoderlein and Stoye (2014). Computation of Bis not feasible in high dimensions, in which case our ti”
IDENTIFYING TREATMENT EFFECTS UNDER DATA COMBINATION (2014, unknown): “3 Hoderlein and Stoye (2009) use the Frechet-Hoe¤ding inequality to bound violations of the revealedpreference axioms in a repeated cross-section context.”
TESTING FOR A GENERAL CLASS OF FUNCTIONAL INEQUALITIES (2013, background): “, Horváth (1991) and Giné, Mason, and Zaitsev (2003)).”