The importance of transport hubs in stepping‐stone invasions

By O. Floerl, G. Inglis, K. Dey, A. Smith. 2009

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/def5a3918ace4855b813f23d64086117074a8618

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Susan L. Williams
2. James T. Carlton
3. E. Grosholz
4. G. Ruiz
5. G. Jamieson
6. S. Bacher
7. Arnaud Estoup
8. Thomas Guillemaud

In Global and Planetary Change

1. James T. Carlton
2. Susan L. Williams
3. E. Grosholz
4. G. Ruiz
5. T. Therriault
6. I. Davidson
7. G. Jamieson
8. S. Bacher

In Oceanography

1. James T. Carlton
2. Susan L. Williams
3. E. Grosholz
4. G. Ruiz
5. T. Therriault
6. I. Davidson
7. G. Jamieson
8. S. Bacher

Citations in the corpus

• Concepts for biocontrol in marine environments: is there a way forward? (2015, unknown): “As the planktonic propagules of these organisms can readily colonise vessels and other transport vectors, infected transport hubs can greatly accelerate human-mediated spread (Floerl and Inglis 2005; Floerl et al. 2009).”
• Quarantine arthropod invasions in Europe: the role of climate, hosts and propagule pressure (2014, methodology): “Despite these regulations, international transport hubs (Floerl et al., 2009) and the world-wide airline network (Tatem, 2009) play a major role in arthropod dispersal.”
• Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what? (2010, background): “The concept of an ‘invasion bridgehead’ refers to widespread secondary invasions stemming from a particularly successful invasive population, which serves as a source of colonists for potentially remote new territories (Downie 2002; Floerl et al. 2009; Hanfling et al. 2002; Kolbe et al. 2004; Miller”
• The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review (2012, background): “Given the ongoing change in global climate and factors that have facilitated the spread of C. intestinalis and other invasive biofouling organisms, there are compelling predictions for an increase in their spread (Stachowicz et al. 2002; Floerl et al. 2009; Sorte et al. 2010).”
• Anthropogenic structures and the infiltration of natural benthos by invasive ascidians (2012, background): “…structures are known to be focal points for marine invasions (Lambert & Lambert 2003; Ruiz et al. 2009) and studies have shown that non-native species are often more prevalent than native species in these man-made environments (Lambert & Lambert 1998; Glasby et al. 2007; Floerl et al. 2009a).”
• Recreational boats as potential vectors of marine organisms at an invasion hotspot (2010, background): “The richness of SF Bay’s and North America’s marine and estuarine non-native species is heavily influenced by biofouling community organisms (Cohen & Carlton 1995, Fofonoff et al. 2003).”
• Managing Multiple Vectors for Marine Invasions in an Increasingly Connected World (2013, background): “Maritime NIS risk assessment has been moving from single-species approaches to the consideration of entire vectors (Floerl et al. 2009, Chan et al. 2013).”