Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis

By Yong Geng, Jia-Yi Fu, Joseph Sarkis, Bing Xue. 2012

793 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dee9d21ef01e635f51b5ae729c5db2a0159b3e0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Sustainability of Circular Economy Indicators and Their Impact on Economic Growth of the European Union (2019, background): “Moreover, other economists [25,26] underline that circular material use rate and trade in recycling materials are strongly correlated with economic growth.”
Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe (2017, background): “, 2006), industrial symbiosis (Geng et al., 2012), product-service systems (Tukker, 2015), remanufacturing (Linder and Williander, 2015), corporate responsibility (Murray et al.”
The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context (2015, background): “…to promote regional development and the natural environment (Yuan et al. 2006; Geng et al. 2008) to the macro or national level, promoting eco-cities, and sustainable production and consumption, ultimately with the intention of promoting a ‘recycling orientated society’ (Geng et al. 2012 p. 217).”
A Review of the Circular Economy and its Implementation (2016, positive): “…standardizing the process of data collection covering all relevant levels including firms, industry, local and central governments and areas of production, consumption and energy, materials and environmental management and specific quantitative goals at local government levels (Geng et al., 2012).”
Circular economy in China – the environmental dimension of the harmonious society (2014, methodology): “There are no systematic indicators to guide and assess business behavior down at the level of firms and businesses (Geng et al. 2012).”
The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options (2017, background): “(Amelia et al., 2009; Badurdeen et al., 2009; Geng et al., 2012; Gerrard and Kandlikar, 2007; Guide et al., 2003; Ingarao et al., 2011; Kazazian, 2003; Kazerooni Sadi et al., 2012; Peng et al., 1997; Price and Joseph, 2000; Rahman et al., 2009; Rahman and Subramanian, 2012; Rusjanto et al., 2011; Si”
A review of the circular economy in China : Moving from rhetoric to implementation (2013, background): “13 Geng et al. (2009) had comprehensively reviewed Dalian’s focus and goals of CE implementation for the period of 2006-2010.”
Prioritization of sustainability indicators for promoting the circular economy: The case of developing countries (2019, neutral): “efficiency and profitability of the production [13].”
A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective (2018, background): “New sets of indicators that correspond to the type and level of applications, such as geography, industry, size of the firm and so on, are needed (Geng et al. 2012; Su et al. 2013).”