On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks
By K. Pawlikowski, H-D. J. Jeong, J. Lee. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2002
490 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ded5c5eb2fe94a6a04d0f664e47f166c8ad41c76
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
Citations in the corpus
- Condition monitoring benefit for onshore wind turbines: sensitivity to operational parameters (2008, background): “This combination of methods eliminates the need for parallel simulation which should be avoided due to the chance of introducing undetected simulation correlations causing bias in the result [23].”
- MANET simulation studies: the incredibles (2005, background): “The authors of [19] [28] [29] [30] show that a 2-dimensional request on a PRNG is valid for approximately 8 3 √ L, where L is the cycle length.”
- Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols (2005, background): “Most of the simplifying assumptions made in the simulations, compounded by limited real-world physical layer modeling capabilities of existing simulators often affect the quality of the results [2] and also their reproducibility.”