The Study of Youth Resilience Across Cultures: Lessons from a Pilot Study of Measurement Development
By M. Ungar, L. Liebenberg, R. Boothroyd, W. Kwong, Tak-yan Lee, J. Leblanc, L. Duque, A. Makhnach. 2008
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dec68a9275297844f8f35804d718cc2f8a1c2f42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In General Health Professions
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Trauma Experiences, Maltreatment-Related Impairments, and Resilience Among Child Welfare Youth in Residential Care (2011, unknown): “71, respectively (Ungar et al. 2008) (no values are given for the new 28-item scale).”
- The social ecology of resilience: addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. (2011, background): “…in the processes that contribute to resilience as an outcome and the broader ecological factors (including the health of the child’s physical ecosystem) that affect developmental trajectories (Cortes & Buchanan, 2007; Lee, Shek, & Kwong, 2007; McCubbin et al., 1998; Ungar et al., 2007, 2008).”
- Moderating Effects of Resilience, Self-Esteem and Social Support on Adolescents’ Reactions to Violence (2010, methodology): “Resilience was measured with the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM; Ungar et al., 2008)-a 28-item measure that has been used with children/ youth from ages 12-23 years.”
- How Should We Measure Psychological Resilience in Sport Performers? (2013, background): “The third issue with measuring protective factors is that the qualities assessed are specific to the context in which they arise and cannot be easily generalized to other populations (Davydov et al., 2010; Ungar et al., 2008).”
- Validation of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure-28 (CYRM-28) Among Canadian Youth (2012, background): “…there would be high factorial invariance of the CYRM-28 subscales across various populations, there would be significant differences in terms of how youth score across ethnoracial, age, and gender groups, reflecting the differential functioning of resilience processes (Ungar et al., 2007, 2008).”
- A methodological review of resilience measurement scales (2011, background): “10 The Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM) (11 countries/11 languages) Ungar et al. (2008) Youth at risk (age 12 to 23) in different countries Self report 4 (28) To develop a culturally and contextually relevant measure of child and youth resilience across four domains (individual,…”