Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Individual Differences in Working Memory and Executive Control: Conceptual and Methodological Issues

By Tal Yarkoni, Todd S. Braver. 2010

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de6f224432f6718c9cd0fa2d11a184fb125efee7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Michael W. Cole
2. Alan Anticevic
3. Grega Repovs
4. Craig Hedge
5. Petroc Sumner
6. Georgina Powell
7. Todd S. Braver
8. Tal Yarkoni

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Craig Hedge
2. Petroc Sumner
3. Georgina Powell
4. Tal Yarkoni
5. Todd S. Braver
6. Grega Repovs
7. Richard J. Haier
8. Naomi P. Friedman

Citations in the corpus

• Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence (2012, background): “Because individual differences analyses typically have substantially lower power to detect effects than within-subject analyses (Braver et al., 2010; Yarkoni et al., 2010), we sought to improve signal-to-noise by averaging both response accuracy and brain activation across all trial types (i.e.,…”
• The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences (2017, methodology): “Barch, Carter, & Comm, 2008), or where individual difference analyses are performed as supplementary analyses in within-subject studies (c.f. Yarkoni & Braver, 2010).”