Estimating the wood density of species for carbon stock assessments

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Functional attributes change but functional richness is unchanged after fragmentation of Brazilian Atlantic forests (2014, methodology): “We made two adjustments (following Flores & Coomes 2011; Hawes et al. 2012): for morphospecies only identified to the family or genus level, we used the average wood density of the taxonomic group; and for species not in the GWD data base, we used the average wood density for the species’ genus.”
Carbon Content of Tree Tissues: A Synthesis (2012, unknown): “models [78,82].”
Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests (2013, unknown): “These sub-models have already been examined (Chave et al. 2004; Feldpausch et al. 2011; Flores & Coomes 2011) in attempts to determine the best ones to apply in different cases.”