Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study

By H. Clark Barrett, Peter M. Todd, Geoffrey F. Miller, P. W. Blythe. 2005

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de5a48884d525da480ee00c6e7a280658c781795

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Designing robots with movement in mind (2014, background): “This tendency has been extensively replicated and analyzed in detail over the years (for a review see: Barrett, Todd, Miller, & Blythe, 2005; Gao, Newman, & Scholl, 2009; Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000).”
Intuitive Theories (2020, background): “…heuristics, such as motion cues, go some way in predicting people's inferences (e.g. avoidance generally motivates an increase in physical distance, cf. Barrett et al., 2005; Zacks, 2004), such accounts are lacking the flexibility to capture the constraints that the environment imposes on behavior.”
Action understanding as inverse planning. (2009, methodology): “Finally, we consider a simple heuristic alternative (H) based on low-level motion cues, inspired by Barrett, Todd, Miller, & Blythe (2005), Blythe, Todd, & Miller (1999), and Zacks (2004).”
Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias (2009, unknown): “With respect to the latter, for example, Barrett et al. (2005) showed adults animations of a variety of social interactions involv ing only naturalistic motion cues (modeled after Heider & Simmel, 194-1).”
9 Perceiving Animacy and Intentionality: Visual Processing or Higher-Level Judgment? (2013, result): “This difference in free reports of animacy seemed universal in the context of the wolfpack effect, and other studies (using different displays) with much more varied subject populations are consistent with the possibility that such percepts of animacy are cross-cultural universals (Barrett et al., 2”
The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species (2015, background): “This ability is independent of cultural background, and improves with age (Barrett et al., 2005).”