Effects of shade on morphology, chlorophyll concentration, and chlorophyll fluorescence of four Pacific Northwest conifer species

By Shafiqur Rehiman Khan, R. Rose, D. Haase, T. Sabin. New forests, 2000

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels (2011, unknown): “Most shade-tolerant plants perform poorly in deep shade, while moderate shade does not have an adverse effect, as was reported for seedlings of Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Quercus suber (Bartlett and Remphrey 1998, Khan et al. 2000, Cardillo and Bernal 2006, Zhang et al. 2007).”
Chlorophyll as a measure of plant health: agroecological aspects. (2014, background): “High light intesity induces thicker leaves, higher Chl a/b ratios and chlorophyll content per unit area, but lower chlorophyll content per unit weight or volume (Boardman, 1977; Khan et al., 2000; Terashima et al., 2006).”
Growth and photosynthetic responses of soybean seedlings to maize shading in relay intercropping system in Southwest China (2014, background): “The reductions in SDM, RDM, and total biomass of GX were significantly lower than those of GQD, implying that GX might be more tolerant to maize shading than GQD (Wang et al. 1994, Khan et al. 2000).”