MORE HARM THAN GOOD: WHEN INVADER VULNERABILITY TO PREDATORS ENHANCES IMPACT ON NATIVE SPECIES

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation (2009, methodology): “We liken rR to overlap in resource preference often modeled in habitat suitability studies (Hirzel & LeLay, 2008), and rP to a comparison of Holt’s (1977) per-capita attack rates, a, among prey species (Noonburg & Byers, 2005).”
Sharing a predator: can an invasive alien pest affect the predation on a local pest? (2013, background): “However, resource competition is known to be a density-dependent interaction (Murdoch et al. 2003), and when present, predators caused a strong reduction in the abundance of pest populations.”
Population‐level declines in Australian predators caused by an invasive species (2009, methodology): “Alternatively, native predators may consume invasives, thereby reducing invader populations while increasing their own biomass (Roemer et al., 2001; Noonburg & Byers, 2005).”
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “…apparent competition: The additional prey subsidy offered by the nonnative species may enhance the predator’s population and, thus, its impact on native prey (Short et al. 2002) to the point where this impact is greater than resource competition from the nonnative species (Noonburg and Byers 2005).”