A review of the fresh/hardened properties and applications for plain- (PRC) and self-compacting rubberised concrete (SCRC)
By Khalid Battal Najim, M. R. Hall. 2010
362 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de429aaaf0bca27688f27d9226f85eb4d7c8149c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
- J. Mills
- Osama Youssf
- M. Guadagnini
- Khalid Battal Najim
- M. R. Hall
- N. F. Medina
- Mohamed A. ElGawady
- K. Pilakoutas
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- J. Mills
- Osama Youssf
- M. Guadagnini
- Khalid Battal Najim
- M. R. Hall
- N. F. Medina
- Mohamed A. ElGawady
- K. Pilakoutas
Citations in the corpus
- An experimental investigation of crumb rubber concrete confined by fibre reinforced polymer tubes (2014, background): “Moreover, CRC has lower tensile strength and modulus of elasticity compared with equivalent conventional concrete [3–11].”
- Optimisation of rubberised concrete with high rubber content: An experimental investigation (2016, background): “blocks [29, 31] and applications for thermal and acoustic insulation [5, 6] and”
- Crumb rubber aggregate coatings/pre-treatments and their effects on interfacial bonding, air entrapment and fracture toughness in self-compacting rubberised concrete (SCRC) (2013, background): “The main challenges of using crumb rubber aggregate include the detrimental effect on the workability/flowability, mechanical strength, and stiffness [5], which is thought to be attributed to poor interfacial bonding between hardened cement paste and the non-polar rubber surfaces [24].”