Preventing Sexual Violence: How Society Should Cope with Sex Offenders

By L. Fond, Q. John. 2005

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de31b1abb64fcf89d77e9f7351891d4feaec586d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Levenson
2. Yolanda Nicole Brannon
3. T. Fortney
4. J. N. Baker
5. David A. D'Amora
6. R. Tewksbury

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Levenson
2. Yolanda Nicole Brannon
3. T. Fortney
4. J. N. Baker
5. David A. D'Amora
6. R. Tewksbury

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of South Carolina’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy on Adult Recidivism (2010, background): “SORN policies enjoy strong public support in part because of the widespread belief that sex offenders are at exceptionally high risk to reoffend and therefore require a higher degree of surveillance than other criminals (LaFond, 2005; Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007; Lieb & Nunlist, 2008).”
• Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence (2007, background): “Lifetime registration may not be necessary for all sex offenders and may in fact decrease low-risk offenders’ potential for successful reintegration because of limited employment and educational opportunities, housing restrictions, and decreased social support (LaFond, 2005; Levenson & Cotter, 2005a”
• Beyond sexual recidivism : a review of the sexual criminal career parameters of adult sex offenders (2013, unknown): “…common myths, stereotypes, and false beliefs about sex offenders' criminal behavior which have, in some instances, served as the foundation to develop new criminal justice policies to tackle the problem of sexual violence and abuse (e.g., La Fond, 2005; Quinn, Forsyth, & Mullen-Quinn, 2004).”
• Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies (2007, background): “Legislative initiatives since the early 1990s have included sex offender registration, community notification, civil commitment, residence restrictions, enhanced sentencing guidelines, and electronic monitoring (LaFond, 2005).”