Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis

By J. Libra, K. Ro, C. Kammann, A. Funke, N. Berge, Y. Neubauer, M. Titirici, C. Fühner, O. Bens, J. Kern and 1 more. 2011

1,645 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de2235c8c77fcd32973c255ff5beeaa0bbfa8cf8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Animesh Dutta
2. H. Kambo
3. R. Balasubramanian
4. C. Coronella
5. J. Lynam
6. Zhengang Liu
7. Wei Yan
8. A. Ross

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Animesh Dutta
2. H. Kambo
3. J. Lynam
4. A. Ross
5. R. Balasubramanian
6. A. Smith
7. Surjit Singh
8. C. Coronella

Citations in the corpus

• A review of wood thermal pretreatments to improve wood composite properties (2013, background): “…(Harris 1952), wet torrefaction (Yan et al. 2010), hydrothermal carbonization (Funke and Ziegler 2010; Falco et al. 2011; Hoekman et al. 2011; Libra et al. 2011), aqueous fractionation, solvolysis or aquasolv (Agbor et al. 2011), aqueous liquefaction (Heitz et al. 1986), or cooking…”
• Hydrothermal carbonization of various lignocellulosic biomass (2014, background): “Another disadvantage of dry torrefaction is the energy needed to dry the feedstock prior to reaction, considered to outweigh the energy released by dry torrefaction if the feedstock has more than 30 % water [6].”