Status, the Distribution of Wealth, and Growth

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When the Joneses’ consumption hurts : Optimal public good provision and nonlinear income taxation (2008, background): “Exceptions are the studies dealing with environmental externalities (e.g. Pirttilä and Tuomala, 1997; Cremer et al., 1998; and Aronsson and Blomquist, 2003), unemployment (e.g. Marceau and Boadway, 1994; Aronsson and Sjögren, 2004; and Aronsson et al., in press), and more recently the taxation of…”
Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles (2008, unknown): “’ The modern-day equivalent of the argument by Mandeville and Smith and many other early economists is made in theoretical models by Glomm and Ravikumar (1994), Corneo and Jeanne (2001), and Pham (2005).(31) The key aspect”
Individual Well-Being in a Dynamic Perspective (2012, unknown): “…identity, the theory modelled social interactions.3 Robson (1992) investigates the implications of including status directly in utility functions defined over wealth on attitudes to risk, and Corneo and Jeanne (2001) and Konrad (1992) perform an analogous exercise with respect to growth rates.”
Income and happiness: Evidence, explanations and economic implications (2006, background): “The modern-day equivalent of the argument by Mandeville and Smith and many other early economists is made in theoretical models by Glomm and Ravikumar (1994), Corneo and Jeanne (2001), and Pham (2005).”