The Effects of Time Limits, the EITC, and Other Policy Changes on Welfare Use, Work, and Income among Female-Headed Families

By Jeffrey T. Grogger. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2003

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The determinants and consequences of child care subsidies for single mothers in the USA (2007, background): “For example, Grogger (2003) reported a welfare participation rate of 15% for female-headed families in 1999 using data”
A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2019, neutral): “…(2001) Currie and Cole (1993) Moffitt (2003) Aid to Families with Dependent Children (Term Limit Modifications) AFDC Term Limits 1996 27 x x x Grogger (2003) Pavetti (1995) Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend Alaska UBI 1998 34 x x x Ackerman et al. (2009) Bhargava and Manoli (2015) Blank and…”
The Effects of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Recent Reforms (2010, background): “Grogger (2003) andHotz, Mullin, and Scholz (2005) rely on relative changes over time in the EITC credit for those with two children relative to those with one.”
Using Differences in Knowledge Across Neighborhoods to Uncover the Impacts of the EITC on Earnings (2013, positive): “Several studies have shown that the EITC clearly increases labor force participation – the extensive-margin response (e.g., Eissa and Liebman 1996, Meyer and Rosenbaum 2001, Grogger 2003, Hotz and Scholz 2006, Gelber and Mitchell 2012).”