OBSERVATIONS OF MASS LOSS FROM THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET HD 209458b

By J. Linsky, Hao Yang, K. France, C. Froning, J. Green, J. Stocke, S. Osterman. 2010

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using the new Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope, we obtained moderate-resolution, high signal/noise ultraviolet spectra of HD 209458 and its exoplanet HD 209458b during transit, both orbital quadratures, and secondary eclipse. We compare transit spectra with spectra obtained at non-transit phases to identify spectral features due to the exoplanet's expanding atmosphere. We find that the mean flux decreased by 7.8% ± 1.3% for the C ii 1334.5323 Å and 1335.6854 Å lines and by 8.2% ± 1.4% for the Si iii 1206.500 Å line during transit compared to non-transit times in the velocity interval −50 to +50 km s−1. Comparison of the C ii and Si iii line depths and transit/non-transit line ratios shows deeper absorption features near −10 and +15 km s−1 and less certain features near −40 and +30–70 km s−1, but future observations are needed to verify this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. Our results for the C ii lines and the non-detection of Si iv 1394.76 Å absorption are in agreement with Vidal-Madjar et al., but we find absorption during transit in the Si iii line contrary to the earlier result. The 8% ± 1% obscuration of the star during transit is far larger than the 1.5% obscuration by the exoplanet's disk. Absorption during transit at velocities between −50 and +50 km s−1 in the C ii and Si iii lines requires high-velocity ion absorbers. Assuming hydrodynamic model values for the gas temperature and outflow velocity at the limb of the outflow as seen in the C ii lines, we find mass-loss rates in the range (8–40)×1010 g s−1. These rates assume that the carbon abundance is solar, which is not the case for the giant planets in the solar system. Our mass-loss rate estimate is consistent with theoretical hydrodynamic models that include metals in the outflowing gas.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de1351d7d93fefec38204e01f5c0f1dc709f219f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. N. Madhusudhan
  3. D. Sing
  4. A. Showman
  5. J. D'esert
  6. M. Marley
  7. H. Knutson
  8. D. Charbonneau

In Instrumentation

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. D. Sing
  3. A. Showman
  4. N. Madhusudhan
  5. H. Knutson
  6. J. D'esert
  7. D. Charbonneau
  8. M. Marley

Citations in the corpus