Phi theory : phi-features across modules and interfaces

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbs (2020, background): “Typologists and formal linguists have argued that grammatical genders are an important feature for morphosyntactic processes (Corbett, 1991, 2006; Harbour et al., 2008; Harbour, 2011; Kramer, 2014, 2015), while some cognitive scientists have shown that grammatical genders can be a perceptual cue—for”
A New Standard of Comparison (2012, background): “This distinction, we suppose, is due to the conditions on Agree which allow it to target elements internal to DPs (see Heim 2008 for application of this logic to DP-internal pronouns).”
Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds (2012, methodology): “…to treat this aspect of pronominal meaning as presuppositional, where presuppositions are understood as conditions on definedness (cf. Cooper 1983, Heim 2008, Kratzer 2009).31 I adopt a slight variation on the standard version of this approach; on my account, the semantics of I and you are given…”
Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis (2014, unknown): “…2009); this is consistent with the architectural assumption that Agree happens on a branch of the derivation that does not feed LF (if the resulting features would have to be interpreted; see Bobaljik, 2008) or with the assumption that such inflectional features have no semantic effect at all.”