The MUSE 3D view of the Hubble Deep Field South

By R. Bacon, J. Brinchmann, J. Richard, Thierry Contini, A. Drake, M. Franx, S. Tacchella, J. Vernet, L. Wisotzki, Jérémy Blaizot and 37 more. 2014

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We observed Hubble Deep Field South with the new panoramic integral-field spectrograph MUSE that we built and have just commissioned at the VLT. The data cube resulting from 27 h of integration covers one arcmin(2) field of view at an unprecedented depth with a 1 sigma emission-line surface brightness limit of 1 x 10(-19) erg s(-1) cm(-2) arcsec(-2), and contains similar to 90 000 spectra. We present the combined and calibrated data cube, and we performed a first-pass analysis of the sources detected in the Hubble Deep Field South imaging. We measured the redshifts of 189 sources up to a magnitude I-814 = 29.5, increasing the number of known spectroscopic redshifts in this field by more than an order of magnitude. We also discovered 26 Ly alpha emitting galaxies that are not detected in the HST WFPC2 deep broad-band images. The intermediate spectral resolution of 2.3 angstrom allows us to separate resolved asymmetric Ly alpha emitters, [O II] 3727 emitters, and C III] 1908 emitters, and the broad instantaneous wavelength range of 4500 angstrom helps to identify single emission lines, such as [O III] 5007, H beta, and H alpha, over a very wide redshift range. We also show how the three-dimensional information of MUSE helps to resolve sources that are confused at ground-based image quality. Overall, secure identifications are provided for 83% of the 227 emission line sources detected in the MUSE data cube and for 32% of the 586 sources identified in the HST catalogue. The overall redshift distribution is fairly flat to z = 6.3, with a reduction between z = 1.5 to 2.9, in the well-known redshift desert. The field of view of MUSE also allowed us to detect 17 groups within the field. We checked that the number counts of [O II] 3727 and Ly alpha emitters are roughly consistent with predictions from the literature. Using two examples, we demonstrate that MUSE is able to provide exquisite spatially resolved spectroscopic information on the intermediate-redshift galaxies present in the field. This unique data set can be used for a wide range of follow-up studies. We release the data cube, the associated products, and the source catalogue with redshifts, spectra, and emission-line fluxes.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddf5bc39068c03380911347cdfadfcc789173ee8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Hopkins
2. M. Cappellari
3. R. Dav'e
4. R. Somerville
5. C. Casey
6. R. Bouwens
7. C. Conroy
8. A. Dekel

Citations in the corpus

• The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey - VIII. Extended Lyman-α haloes around high-z star-forming galaxies (2017, methodology): “Here, we extend the W16 LAE sample by one order of magnitude using the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (UDF) data obtained with MUSE (Bacon et al. 2015).”
• Extended Lyman α haloes around individual high-redshift galaxies revealed by MUSE (2015, methodology): “We observed a single 1′×1′ field in the Hubble Deep Field South (HDFS), with a combined on-sky exposure time of 27 h.”
• UBIQUITOUS GIANT Lyα NEBULAE AROUND THE BRIGHTEST QUASARS AT z ∼ 3.5 REVEALED WITH MUSE (2016, background): “It is known that MUSE cubes reduced with the standard pipeline might have small astrometric offsets in the coordinate system because of a small "derotator wobble" (Bacon et al. 2015).”
• The Keck Cosmic Web Imager Integral Field Spectrograph (2018, background): “In recent years, integral field spectrographs have proliferated at major observatories around the world (Allington-Smith et al. (2002); Bacon et al. (2001, 2015); Larkin et al. (2006); Zurlo et al. (2014)).”
• ZAP -- Enhanced PCA Sky Subtraction for Integral Field Spectroscopy (2016, methodology): “This dataset is full described in Bacon et al. (2015).”
• The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey: I. Survey description, data reduction and source detection (2017, methodology): “The overall process for the UDF follows the data reduction strategy developed for the HDFS (Bacon et al. 2015) but with improved processes and additional procedures (see Conseil et al. 2017).”
• An Extreme Protocluster of Luminous Dusty Starbursts in the Early Universe (2017, methodology): “The data were reduced using the MUSE pipeline, which performed all the basic reduction steps (Bacon et al. 2015).”