Modeling Containment of Large Wildfires Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Analysis
By Mark Finney, Isaac C. Grenfell, Charles W. McHugh. Forestry sciences, 2009
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Billions of dollars are spent annually in the United States to contain large wildland fires, but the factors contributing to suppression success remain poorly understood. We used a regression model (generalized linear mixed-model) to model containment probability of individual fires, assuming that containment was a repeated-measures problem (fixed effect) and individual fires were random effects. Changes in daily fire size from 306 fires occurring in years 2001–2005 were processed to identify intervals of high spread from those of low spread. The model was tested against independent data from 140 fires in 2006. The analysis suggested that containment was positively related to the number of consecutive days during which the fire grew little and the number of previous intervals. Containment probability was negatively related to the length of intervals during which the fire exhibited high spread and the presence of timber fuel types, but fire size was not a significant predictor. Characterization of containment probability may be a useful component of cost-benefit analysis of large fire management and planning systems.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddf4ba693213508a364db866c80f637146addc48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Citations in the corpus
- The spatially varying influence of humans on fire probability in North America (2016, background): “Conversely, in other regions or ecosystems of the world, such as in parts of North America, land-use change and a culture of aggressive fire suppression may limit fire activity (Cumming 2005, Finney et al 2009).”
- Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. (2011, background): “Two key sources of knowledge uncertainty are modeling the ecological response of resource values (in terms of provision of ecosystem services, etc.) to fire (Keane et al., 2008), and the efficacy of various suppression activities (Finney et al., 2009).”