Determining management behaviour in European banking

By Jonathan M. Williams. 2004

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dded8c97390a56ff5193177eecd47749af1e70fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Risk, capital and efficiency in Chinese Banking (2013, unknown): “Bad management hypothesis: this is labelled by Berger and De Young (1997) and Williams (2004) suggesting that higher costs will be incurred for the banks with lower levels of efficiency due to the fact that credit is inadequately monitored and operating”
Performance and Merton-type default risk of listed banks in the EU: A panel VAR approach (2009, background): “Most researchers (Berger and DeYoung, 1997; Williams, 2004; Podpiera and Weill, 2008) have focused on the relationship between efficiency 3 and credit risk, usually proxied by problem loans or loan loss provisions.”
Risk, competition and efficiency in banking: Evidence from China (2018, unknown): “The bad management hypothesis (Berger & DeYoung, 1997; Williams, 2004) states that lower efficiency raises costs because banks do not monitor credit adequately and do not control expenses efficiently.”
Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach (2013, background): “Alternatively, NPLs measure management behaviour through bad luck or bad management hypotheses introduced by Berger and De Young (1997), Williams (2004).”
Factors influencing bank risk in Europe: Evidence from the financial crisis (2015, methodology): “panel models by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998), also”
Financial openness, risk and bank efficiency: Cross-country evidence (2016, methodology): “…it at least plausible to hypothesize the existence of an additional indirect – positive or 2 Indeed, a number of studies have examined the trade-offs between bank efficiency and risk using Granger causality techniques (see, e.g., Berger and DeYoung, 1997; Williams, 2004; Fiordelisi et al., 2011).”
Efficiency and Risk in European Banking (2011, unknown): “In stark contrast to Williams (2004), Altunbas et al., (2007) do not find a positive relationship between inefficiency and bank risk-taking.”
Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance (2013, background): “Williams (2004) who focused on the relationship between loan quality and cost efficiency among European savings banks from 1990–1998, Podpiera and Weil (2008), who analyzed the Czech banks between 1994–2005, and Louzis, Vouldis and Metaxas (2010), who examined the determinants of NPLs in the Greek…”
Banking Competition and Efficiency: A Micro-Data Analysis on the Czech Banking Industry (2008, methodology): “(1997) for US banks and Williams (2004) for Western European savings banks also provide”
The effect of capital ratios on the risk, efficiency and profitability of banks: Evidence from OECD countries (2017, unknown): “In a similar context, Berger and De Young (1997) as well as Williams (2004) refer to the “bad management” hypothesis, whereby inefficient banks engage in riskier activities – compared to efficient banks – to increase their returns in order to cover for any managerial inadequacies or inefficient…”
Competition and Financial Stability in European Cooperative Banks (2014, background): “Jaeger and Paserman, 2008; Assenmacher-Wesche and Gerlach, 2008) as well as in banking studies (e.g. Fiordelisi et al., 2011, Fiordelisi and Molyneux, 2010; Casu and Girardone, 2009; Williams, 2004).”