Trade openness and economic growth : a cross-country empirical investigation

By Bülent Ulaṣan. 2008

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dde23bf812c4e273880ff9e8b4fd5354ba0cbbe7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Trade and Economic Growth: A Re-Examination of the Empirical Evidence (2012, unknown): “Yanikkaya (2003) provides an extensive survey of the literature. imports as a share of GDP.”
Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: The Case of Emerging Economies (2018, background): “The empirical studies largely support the positive effect of trade openness to economic growth (for example, [20]).”
Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: The case of developing countries, 1970–2009 (2015, methodology): “On the other side, TS-based openness measures refer either to the export share in GDP (X/GDP), the import share in GDP (M/GDP), or the share of total trade in GDP ((X + M)/GDP) (Harrison 1996; Irwin and Tervio 2002; Yanikkaya 2003; Lee, Ricci, and Rigobon 2004; Kim and Lin 2009; Kim 2011), as well a”
Thresholds in the Finance-Growth Nexus : A Cross-Country Analysis (2011, unknown): “Such effects of trade openness on growth have been studied extensively (see Yanikkaya, 2003, for a comprehensive survey).”
The Impact of Financial Development and Trade on the Economic Growth of Bolivia (2012, background): “In the same line, Yanikkaya (2003) finds that trade liberalization does not have a simple and straightforward relationship with growth, and Dowrick and Golley (2004), analyzing the winners and losers of trade, find that since 1980 the benefits of trade accrued mostly to richer economies.”
Military Expenditure, Economic Growth and Heterogeneity (2015, unknown): “…Edwards (1998), Frankel and Romer (1999) and Dollar and Kraay (2004) and those finding that find trade openness has a negative effect on growth including Yanikkaya (2003), with Rodriguez and Rodrik (2000) finding little evidence that open trade policies are associated with economic growth.”
Trade and Growth at Different Stages of Economic Development (2009, background): “Harrison (1996), Yanikkaya (2003), Dowrick and Golley (2004), and Rassekh (2007) provide evidence of differential effects of trade in terms of the level of real development.2 Accordingly, if such a nonlinear relationship exists, we should be able to estimate the threshold at which the sign of the…”
Does trade openness affect long run growth? Cointegration, causality and forecast error variance decomposition tests for Pakistan (2012, background): “See for more details, Xu, 1998; Proudman et al. 1998; Balaguer and Cantavella-Jorda, 2002 and Yanikkaya, 2003 3.”
Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of 16 African and non-African low-income countries (2018, background): “Yanikkaya (2003) argued that trade grants developing countries access to investment and intermediate goods that are vital to their development processes.”
The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue (2011, unknown): “…the relationship between openness and growth: measures based on trade restrictions/distortions (e.g., Pritchett, 1996; Harrison 1996; Edwards, 1998; Yanikkaya, 2003), “qualitative” indices aimed at classifying countries according to their trade and global policy regime (such as the 1987 World…”
Trade structure and economic growth (2007, background): “The implementation and dissemination of foreign innovations is made easier when more people become familiar with the language and the conventions of these innovations (see Yanikkaya, 2003, for related ideas).”
The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire (2017, background): “According to the theory of comparative advantage, trade leads to a more efficient use of domestic resources through the imports of capital goods and intermediate inputs that otherwise are too costly to produce locally (Yanikkaya, 2003).”
Differential effects of trade on economic growth and investment: A cross-country empirical investigation (2015, background): “Using different measures of trade openness (trade volumes and trade restrictions), Yanikkaya (2003) found strong evidence in support of the positive relationship between trade and growth through channels such as technology transfers, scale economies and comparative advantage.”
Capital account openness and the labour share of income (2007, background): “2 Yanikkaya (2003) lists over 20 indicators of trade openness that have been used. labour share of income.”
The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration (2007, methodology): “An excellent introduction to this literature is Rauch and Casella (2001) and the critique by Zuckerman (2003). Systems- or network-based measures of globalization have, to the best of our knowledge, not been used in economics before, but there is antecedent in the sociology literature. A paper by Sm”