Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation
By Jere R. Francis, E. Wilson. 2016
346 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddddd6aed6c2ecabad589b8a827d2552530939c9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mikhail Pevzner
- Xiangang Xin
- Kamran Ahmed
- M. Houqe
- Jeong‐Bon Kim
- Tony Zijl
- Jeffrey L. Callen
- Ahsan Habib
Citations in the corpus
- Audit Quality, Earnings Management, and Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from India (2017, background): “Simunic and Stein (1987) and Francis and Wilson (1988) argue that Big 4 international accounting firms have an established brand name reputation and, therefore, are strongly motivated to protect their reputation by providing high-quality audits.”
- Big N Auditors and Audit Quality: New Evidence from Quasi-Experiments (2019, unknown): “reputational concerns and higher independence than non-Big N auditors, they are more likely to have higher audit quality (Francis and Wilson 1988).”
- Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership (2018, background): “Given the role of high-quality audits in reducing the information asymmetry, the demand for such audits commonly arises from the need for external monitoring on behalf of outside shareholders and debtholders (Francis and Wilson 1988).”