Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks

By S. Cadrin. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2000

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Geometry and Topology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddcafaa75462678200ce0f738e341c20cddcde59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Geometry and Topology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Does fish scale morphology allow the identification of populations at a local scale? A case study for rostrum dace Leuciscus leuciscus burdigalensis in River Viaur (SW France) (2005, positive): “Geographical isolation can result in the development of different morphological features between fish populations because the interactive effects of environment, selection and genetics on individual ontogenies produce morphometric differences within a species (Cadrin, 2000).”
Morphometrics and Length-Weight Relationship in the Blue Swimmer Crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758)(Decapoda, Brachyura) from the Mandapam Coast, India (2011, background): “In population studies, morphometric analysis provides a powerful complement to genetic and environmental stock identification approaches (Cadrin, 2000) and length-weight relationships allow the conversion of growth-in-length equations to growth-in-weight for use in a stock assessment model…”
Population structure of beaked redfish, Sebastes mentella: evidence of divergence associated with different habitats (2010, background): “Morphological patterns can also reflect life-history differences and possibly adaptations Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-abstract/67/8/1617/603289 by guest on 29 July 2018 to different environments (Cadrin, 2000).”
Genetic and morphometric variations in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of a fragmented delta (2004, methodology): “We used morphometric and meristic characters (Meng & Stocker 1984, Hurlbut & Clay 1998, Cadrin 2000), otolith shape (Bird et al. 1986, Campana & Casselman 1993, Friedland & Reddin 1994, Begg & Brown 2000) and protein electrophoresis (Allendorf & Phelps 1981, Berrebi et al. 2000).”
Use of otolith shape for stock identification of John's snapper, Lutjanus johnii (Pisces: Lutjanidae), from the Persian Gulf and the Oman Sea (2014, background): “, 2003), body shape (Cadrin, 2000; Turan, 2004) and genetic variability (Jónsdóttir et al.”
Morphometric variation among sardine (Sardina pilchardus) populations from the northeastern Atlantic and the western Mediterranean (2003, methodology): “…commonly accepted that morphological variation has both environmental and genetic components, but that stable differences in shape among groups of fish may reveal different growth, mortality, or reproductive rates that are relevant for the definition of stocks (Swain and Foote, 1999; Cadrin, 2000).”
Relationship between shape and trophic ecology of selected species of Sparids of the Caprolace coastal lagoon (Central Tyrrhenian sea) (2007, methodology): “This method quantifies change in shape, and patterns of morphometric variations within- and among-groups can be quantified if each individual is considered to deviate from an ‘average’ shape, namely the consensus configuration (Cadrin 2000).”