Identification and elimination of false positives in electrochemical nitrogen reduction studies

By Jaecheol Choi, Bryan H. R. Suryanto, Dabin Wang, H. Du, Rebecca Y. Hodgetts, Federico M. Ferrero Vallana, D. Macfarlane, A. Simonov. Nature Communications, 2020

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Ammonia is of emerging interest as a liquefied, renewable-energy-sourced energy carrier for global use in the future. Electrochemical reduction of N2 (NRR) is widely recognised as an alternative to the traditional Haber–Bosch production process for ammonia. However, though the challenges of NRR experiments have become better understood, the reported rates are often too low to be convincing that reduction of the highly unreactive N2 molecule has actually been achieved. This perspective critically reassesses a wide range of the NRR reports, describes experimental case studies of potential origins of false-positives, and presents an updated, simplified experimental protocol dealing with the recently emerging issues. Discovering a sustainable route to ammonia as a fertiliser and as an energy carrier is critically important, but many recent reports on the electrochemical nitrogen reduction are false positives. Here the authors uncover the emerging experimental traps and detail protocols to reliably avoid them.

Subfields: Catalysis, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddbadd448cb98d111aa95db33bc5ccb6869638ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Catalysis

1. P. Strasser
2. A. Varela
3. Karen Chan
4. J. Rossmeisl
5. A. Bagger
6. B. Roldán Cuenya
7. Jens K. Nørskov

In Materials Chemistry

1. P. Strasser
2. Karen Chan
3. S. Boettcher
4. B. Roldán Cuenya
5. B. Seger
6. I. Stephens
7. A. Varela
8. J. Rossmeisl

Citations in the corpus

• 2022 roadmap on low temperature electrochemical CO2 reduction (2022, background): “In aqueous media, two major problems are observed: the reported FE are low and most of these studies lack of reliability [232].”