Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling

By Mohsen Joshanloo. 2016

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddb08f90efd8ecc652072bf8efafbd5b3e930b36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Disabato
2. Fallon R. Goodman
3. Scott Kauffman
4. T. Kashdan
5. Paul J Silvia
6. M. Steger
7. Patrick Mussel
8. Richard M. Ryan

In Health

1. Scott Kauffman
2. Fallon R. Goodman
3. D. Disabato
4. T. Kashdan

In Social Psychology

1. D. Disabato
2. Fallon R. Goodman
3. Scott Kauffman
4. T. Kashdan
5. M. Steger
6. Tayyab Rashid
7. Richard M. Ryan
8. G. Bonanno

Citations in the corpus

• Clarifying the Concept of Well-Being: Psychological Need Satisfaction as the Common Core Connecting Eudaimonic and Subjective Well-Being (2019, unknown): “EWB (Joshanloo, 2016) Eudaimonic SWB (Nikolaev, 2018) EWB (Lee, Bradburn, Johnson, Lin, & Chang, 2019)”
• Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA (2018, methodology): “These results were replicated in Dutch, New Zealand, and Iranian samples, with no latent correlation exceeding 0.71 (Joshanloo & Lamers, 2016; Joshanloo, Jose, & Kiepikowski, 2017; Joshanloo, 2016a).”