Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy

By W. Boehler. 2005

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd8dd66cd0326b03fe46994a0b65fbe397439723

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Large-Scale Data for Multiple-View Stereopsis (2016, background): “In Boehler et al. (2003) the authors describe a detailed study of several laser-based scanners for large-scale, architectural scenes.”
Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques (2011, background): “According to Boehler and Marbs [28], in certain cases laser scanning can be less accurate than photogrammetry or image-based reconstruction techniques, though the metric for this”
Incidence angle influence on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points (2009, background): “This influencing factor includes the surface property (Boehler et al., 2003), i.e. the material (Pfeifer et al., 2008, Hoefle and Pfeifer, 2007, Kaasalainen et al., 2005, Bucksch et al., 2007) and the shape (Leader, 1979, Kersten et al., 2005) dependent anisotropy.”
Deformation measurement using terrestrial laser scanning data and least squares 3D surface matching (2008, methodology): “Useful additional references include a review of TLS (Pfeifer and Lichti, 2004), a survey of the commercially available TLS systems (Lemmens, 2004), a classification of terrestrial laser scanners (Fröhlich and Mettenleiter, 2004), and an analysis of the quality of the points recorded by laser scanne”
Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) (2013, background): “These characteristics increase with distance and incidence angle (e.g. Soudarissanane et al., 2009, 2011) and may depend on surface characteristics for some instruments (e.g. Boehler et al., 2003).”