Coexistence, saturation and invasion resistance in simulated plant assemblages

By Joslin L. Moore, N. Mouquet, J. Lawton, Michel Loreau. 2001

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd812bc46fe18a6bc29f3195567ad9e505c2569f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters (2002, background): “Invasibility was discussed in this context in a previous paper, where it was shown that species richness is likely to be a poor predictor of invasion resistance (Moore et al. 2001).”
Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states (2005, background): “2004), and the exact nature of the relationship depends critically on the cause of the underlying species richness gradient (Moore et al. 2001).”
A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity (2004, background): “The community matrix provided an objective way of assessing how successfully species could invade communities and the ability of species interactions to limit community membership (Moore et al. 2001; Shurin & Allen 2001; Mouquet et al. 2002).”
INVASIBILITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS OF A COMMUNITY: A NEUTRAL MODEL AND A SURVEY OF PUBLISHED DATA (2004, methodology): “Moore et al. (2001) showed that the sign and strength of NAR depends on the underlying cause of species richness, with negative slopes likely but by no means necessary.”
Invasibility and species richness of island endemic arthropods: a general model of endemic vs. exotic species (2006, background): “…of invasibility often provide contradictory results in which species richness and dominance facilitate or impede the invasion success of introduced species (Mack et al., 2000; Kolar & Lodge, 2001; Moore et al., 2001; Rosenzweig, 2001; Kennedy et al., 2002; Bruno et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2004).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Furthermore, simulation models suggest that processes regulating species richness in resident communities crucially affect the pattern of invasibility along species richness gradients (Moore et al., 2001) and that the diversityinvasibility relationship depends on the size of the species pool (Herben”
INVASIBILITY AND ABIOTIC GRADIENTS: THE POSITIVE CORRELATION BETWEEN NATIVE AND EXOTIC PLANT DIVERSITY (2005, background): “One plausible explanation is that environmental factors that promote high native diversity also favor establishment of exotic species (Shea and Chessson 2002), and that the native community is not species saturated (Sax and Brown 2000, Moore et al. 2001, Dupré et al. 2002, Ricklefs 2004).”
Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie. (2004, background): “…et al. 1999, Stachowicz et al. 1999, Tilman 1999, Levine 2000, Naeem et al. 2000, Prieur-Richard et al. 2000, Symstad 2000, Lyons and Schwartz 2001, Moore et al. 2001, Kennedy et al. 2002, Troumbis et al. 2002) and evenness (Wilsey and Polley 2002) at small spatial scales and in relatively…”
The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management (2006, background): “…the life-history traits that predispose some introduced species to become more invasive than others (i.e., their invasiveness) (e.g., Grotkopp et al. 2002), and the susceptibility of the community to become invaded by these species (i.e., its invasibility) (Mack et al. 2000; Moore et al. 2001).”