The emergence and troubled growth of a 'biopower' innovation system in Sweden

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology (2013, background): “More specifically, many studies on new energy technologies highlight the importance of formal institutions providing financial incentives or other regulatory support (Decker et al., 2007; Jacobsson, 2008; Jacobsson et al., 2004; Walz, 2007).”
The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system (2009, background): “In earlier empirical work these functions have been used effectively to deliver explanations for the success or failure of technological trajectories of sustainable energy technologies in various countries (see e.g. Alkemade et al., 2007; Hekkert et al., 2007a; Jacobsson et al., 2002; Jacobsson, 200”
Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008 (2010, background): “27 A possible example is the Finish firm Wärtsilä " s development of module based smaller CHP plants that reduce the scale sensitivity of power production (Jacobsson, 2008).”