Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling
By Heewoo Jun, Rewon Child, Mark Chen, John Schulman, Aditya Ramesh, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever. 2020
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Generative Models
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Generative Models
- Arash Vahdat
- Karsten Kreis
- Stefano Ermon
- Jonathan Ho
- Diederik P. Kingma
- Mohammad Norouzi
- Jan Kautz
- Tim Salimans
Citations in the corpus
- Variational Diffusion Models (2021, background): “43 Sparse Transformer + DistAug [Jun et al., 2020] AR 2.”
- Score-based Generative Modeling in Latent Space (2021, background): “[78] Heewoo Jun, Rewon Child, Mark Chen, John Schulman, Aditya Ramesh, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever.”
- Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middle (2022, background): “DistAug [Jun et al., 2020] is another related work that trains jointly on transformed data while conditioning on the transformation type.”
- Learning Energy-Based Models by Diffusion Recovery Likelihood (2020, neutral): “Model BPD ↓ DDPM (Ho et al., 2020) 3.70 Glow (Kingma & Dhariwal, 2018) 3.35 Flow++ (Ho et al., 2019) 3.08 PixelCNN (Van den Oord et al., 2016) 3.03 Sparse Transformer (Child et al., 2019) 2.80 DistAug (Jun et al., 2020) 2.56 Ours † ( T1k ) 3.18 Interpolation.”
- Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Models (2021, background): “The likelihood for CIFAR-10 can be significantly improved by incorporating advanced data augmentation, as demonstrated in [25, 41].”
- Learning to Efficiently Sample from Diffusion Probabilistic Models (2021, background): “…[2020], Nichol and Dhariwal [2021], augmenting UNet with self-attention [Shaw et al., 2018] in scales where attention is computationally feasible has helped bring DDPMs closer to the current state-of-the-art autoregressive generative models [Child et al., 2019, Jun et al., 2020, Roy et al., 2021].”
- Score Matching Model for Unbounded Data Score (2021, background): “53 [20]) on CIFAR10 with performance of 2.”
- Text Data Augmentation for Deep Learning (2021, methodology): “Further, DistAug [138] even tests Data Augmentation with large scale pixel autoregressive modeling in the ImageGPT model [139].”
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis (2023, methodology): “This is a form of conditioning-augmentation, and has been used in various forms with autoregressive [20] models, and more recently with diffusion models [21].”
- Graph Contrastive Learning Automated (2021, background): “That aligns with the observations in (Lee et al., 2020; Jun et al., 2020), showing that disentan-gling augmented and original feature distributions could have the model benefit more from stronger augmentations.”
- Combiner: Full Attention Transformer with Sparse Computation Cost (2021, methodology): “We run all of the models in Table 2 without data augmentation [33].”
- iFlow: Numerically Invertible Flows for Efficient Lossless Compression via a Uniform Coder (2021, background): “Compared to other classes of generative models, normalizing flows typically perform best in both tasks of probability density estimation (as compared with variational autoencoders [24, 15, 8]) and inference speed (as compared with autoregressive factorizations [35, 39, 22]).”
- Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models (2021, unknown): “+ DistAug [32], [110] ????? ????? ????? ????? 7 3 14.”
- Analog Bits: Generating Discrete Data using Diffusion Models with Self-Conditioning (2022, methodology): “…are based on autoregressive modeling (Van den Oord et al., 2016; Salimans et al., 2017; Parmar et al., 2018; Child et al., 2019; Roy et al., 2021; Jun et al., 2020; Sutskever et al., 2014; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022), where the networks, often Transformers (Vaswani et al., 2017),…”
- Distribution Augmentation for Low-Resource Expressive Text-To-Speech (2022, unknown): “As explained in [7], DistAug method can be interpreted as a form of data-dependent regularization that reduces overfitting.”
- Efficient-VDVAE: Less is more (2022, background): “Deep autoregressive models[1, 2, 3, 4] have long achieved the best log likelihoods across different modalities.”