Effects of High Temperature on the Development of Pollen Mother Cells and Microspores in Barley Hordeum vulgare L.
By T. Sakata, Hideyuki Takahashi, I. Nishiyama, A. Higashitani. Journal of plant research, 2000
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd4793367d7098d7d081dbb35660d1f3e73eafc8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- High-temperature induction of male sterility during barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) anther development is mediated by transcriptional inhibition (2005, background): “high-temperature stress, and that the abnormal terminal phenotypes generated by heat stress at each stage of development are different from each other (Sakata et al. 2000).”
- Heat stress affects vegetative and reproductive performance and trait correlations in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) (2017, background): “Similar conclusions were drawn for other plant species, such as bean, cowpea, groundnut, brachypodium, barley and rice (Ahmed et al. 1992; Prasad et al. 1999; Suzuki et al. 2000; Sakata et al. 2000; Harsant et al. 2013).”
- Temperature stress and plant sexual reproduction: uncovering the weakest links. (2010, background): “For example, in wheat, heat stress during the period of microspore meiosis can induce tapetum degradation (Saini et al., 1984; Sakata et al., 2000).”
- The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. (2007, unknown): “and barley (Sakata et al. 2000).”
- The effect of high temperature stress on male and female reproduction in plants (2015, background): “…development (Giorno et al., 2013; Smyth et al., 1990), the ‘days-before-anthesis’ as a guide for predicting the stages of anther/pollen development (Satake and Yoshida, 1978; Sakata et al., 2000; Jain et al., 2007; Giorno et al., 2013) or other phenotypic markers (Jagadish et al., 2014).”